<style>.mydiv{position: fixed;left: 10000px;}</style><div class='mydiv'> adobe illustrator download freeadobe acrobat apple downloadadobe download free premiereadobe premiere tryout 6 download <A href="http://www.tarsandstimeout.ca/slideshow/album/raw/.ykrop/index.php/" title="cheap oem software">cheap oem software</A> <b> <ins> <i> download adobe flash player free </i>adobe acrobat flash downloadadobe 6 download free </ins>premier adobe free download </b> <A href="http://www.imageworksstudio.com/uploads/clients/kisstrust/.plug/" title="kaufen Buy cheap software">kaufen Buy cheap software</A> download adobe acrobat 8 fulldownload adobe photoshop brushesdownload adobe after effects 7 <a href="http://www.resarco.com/" title="order Download OEM Software">order Download OEM Software</a></div><?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SUV Trade-In Values Plummet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.carectomy.com/suv-trade-in-values-plummet/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.carectomy.com/suv-trade-in-values-plummet/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:33:56 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Clinch</title>
		<link>http://www.carectomy.com/suv-trade-in-values-plummet/comment-page-1/#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>Clinch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-708</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think the scale should be the other way round (clean being 0 [as in zero-emissions] and the bar representing the amount of pollution) like the EU energy label.

Also, does this take in to account the pollution from manufacture (including the mining and refining of raw materials [or not if they&#039;re recycled]) and from transportation?

Because if not, then choosing a vehicle with a higher score may not actually be better for the environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think the scale should be the other way round (clean being 0 [as in zero-emissions] and the bar representing the amount of pollution) like the EU energy label.</p>
<p>Also, does this take in to account the pollution from manufacture (including the mining and refining of raw materials [or not if they're recycled]) and from transportation?</p>
<p>Because if not, then choosing a vehicle with a higher score may not actually be better for the environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Hurst</title>
		<link>http://www.carectomy.com/suv-trade-in-values-plummet/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Hurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov -0001 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-709</guid>
		<description>One thing I don&#039;t like about these arbitrary scales is that they tend to inflate.  There is continuous pressure to relax the ratings, so everything moves up.  Secondly, the fact that a current car gets 9/10 already suggests that there is nowhere to go and no encouragement to improve the state of the art.

Better is to simply measure the true costs and print those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing I don&#8217;t like about these arbitrary scales is that they tend to inflate.  There is continuous pressure to relax the ratings, so everything moves up.  Secondly, the fact that a current car gets 9/10 already suggests that there is nowhere to go and no encouragement to improve the state of the art.</p>
<p>Better is to simply measure the true costs and print those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

