Quantcast
Where Do Tires Go When They Die? Print E-mail
Written by Kate Trainor   
Sunday, 20 April 2008


First, I must fess up: I own a car (which I drive about once a week). Secondly, I’ll confess that I scarcely know how to drive it (at least, safely, or with any sense of ease). Until two years ago, when I moved from a big city to the backwater boonies and bought my first set of (gently used, fuel-efficient) wheels, I’d never really driven anywhere, excepting on a small handful of haphazard road trips. In the city, I hadn’t ever needed to drive. So, last week, when I rolled up to my destination (work) with a totally flat tire, I was sure it was my hypocrisy biting me in the ass; a sign that it was time to stop with my timorous, half-hacked carectomy and challenge myself with the real deal. (In my defense, I’d taken the car that morning because I’d gotten an irreparable flat on my bike the day before. Still, the guilt burned.)

Without any tutorial or illustrated manual, I managed to bust the bolts from the wheel with the sock wrench and was able to screw on the spare. At the tire shop the next day, the dude behind the desk told me how much it would cost (I’m convinced that cars, between the cost of unforeseen repairs and gas prices, keep people in debt), and casually inquired if I wanted to keep my tires.

“What would I do with them?” I asked. “Besides make a tire swing?” A tire swing might be fun, I thought, or a pair of shoes, a makeshift flower bed, or the beginnings of my own earthship? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earthship But, seriously, I wondered where tires—millions of them—go when they die. What happens to all of that indestructible burnt rubber?

My research confirmed my suspicions: most tires end up in dumps, landfills, or as fuel that generates harsh emissions (and even greater waste). The majority (42%), in fact, are used as fuel for cement kilns, pulp and paper plants, and power plants. The remaining scrap tires are left to languish in dumps (12%) and landfills (10%), or are used as crumb rubber (i.e. in asphalt, for paving, 12%). Fourteen percent of used tires are recycled for civil works projects (i.e. as roadbeds and drainage liners), while five percent are exported (for what purpose, I don’t know). A flimsy five percent are used to make doormats and sandals (3%), and for miscellaneous projects, like planters, art, and tire swings (2%).



Here are the hard numbers from TireStamp:

 

“There’s no single processing or disposal solution for scrap tires. About 115 million tires become fuel in places such as cement kilns, pulp and paper mills and power plants. Another 28 million tires go to landfills. Some 40 million go to what Blumenthal calls civil engineering applications, including roadbeds and drainage liners.
The crumb, or ground, rubber market uses 33 million tires per year, and 15 million are exported. Another 8 million are stamped into other products such as doormats, and 7 million go to agriculture and miscellaneous uses such as tire swings, planters and modern art, Blumenthal said. With 75 percent of used tires finding other markets and 10 percent finding landfills, that leaves 15 percent in dumps, stockpiles or processors´ inventories.”


Nova Scotia,CA banned the burning and landfilling of scrap tires in 1996 and has seen a strong effort to recycle scrap tires ever since.

 



If you’re looking to geek out by recycling your retired tires in an eco-friendly way, here’s a list of possibilities:

Blooming tire planters
Tire sandals
Tire swings
More ideas

Click here for more information from the Scrap Tire Management Council.

Photos via flickr by fetopher & theentiremikey.

 

Comments (6)add comment

MarkR said:

 
Honestly Kate, I'm actually glad to hear you have a car and live in a rural area, it humanizes you. Honestly if I had any thought you never drove a car or never lived out of the city, It would limit your credibility in my view. I truly believe you have to participate in something in order to fully understand it before you can call for its removal or demise with any real credibility. Its probably one reason why I like your writing. It will also help you understand the plight of the majority. Thats a breath of fresh air when some will damn and condemn without having a real understanding of what most people are dealing with. Don't hide the fact that you own or owned a car if you want to appear credible to the majority of people and even the majority of cyclists embrace it as you try to minimize or eliminate its usage. Kate, its kind of like a 12 step program, stand up and say, "hi, my name is Kate and I own a car."

The room of people respond in unison, "HI Kate!"
smilies/grin.gif

April 21, 2008

cprise said:

 
Ah, but wouldn't it be heartening to hear from throngs of people who happily lived without cars their whole lives?

If we are reluctant to identify with such people, then we are more likely to internalize the sort of active dehumanization that society often paints enviros with; and it will get worse as we get closer to truly sustainable goals. I don't want to "savor" or make peace with or linger on my unsustainable side; it needs to be over with ASAP without sentimentality. I can (and should) be tactful and approachable about getting my eco-message across without being sheepish or seemingly guilty that I am inhumanly placing expectations on anyone.

Why wouldn't others want this as well?

At the end of the day, there will be people for whom we are damned if we do have a car-centric past ("hypocrite") and damned if we don't ("not credible/realistic"). The primary way to deal with them is to enthuse enough of the people around them that they learn to think before opening their big, over-privileged mouthes; for then it will be a matter of THEIR credibility when they want to trivialize an urbanite, who stayed green for whatever reason.

Similar thoughts go toward society's zeal for dehumanizing urbanites, even if only in the subtext based on bad assumptions and prejudices. We need to call people on that and raise awareness of how unhealthy it is in a number of ways material and otherwise.

April 21, 2008

Fred Camino said:

 
I get what Kate is saying, but I also find it funny that your occasional reliance on a machine is what humanizes you!
April 21, 2008 | url

Fred Camino said:

 
Errr.... by "Kate" I mean "MarkR", and I was referring to his comment. Sorry!
April 21, 2008 | url

MarkR said:

 
My point being, if you have never driven a car you obviously don't understand what 98% of the population is going through when they consider going without.

If you call for 98% of the population to do something you better have a working knowledge of what they do and how they do it and be able to relate to them how to cope and adapt.
If someone walked up to me, and I'm a person who has been driving on private property since the age of 10 and they told me,"you must get rid of a car" but yet they have never driven much less owned and relied on it for over 25years. They have no grasp much less the understanding of what it is like to have it and then get rid of it and rearrange their life without one. Therefore in my opinion they can't relate to the majority of people and will be an ineffectual tool for change. And that person would be totally ineffectual if they've never lived in an area without mass transit, and tried to cope without a automobile or masstransit.

As far as the "humanization" comment. I'm sure its a bad generalization but by my experience I view most city downtown type dwellers, that have never had a car and lives in a high rise, and never lived without mass transit as people who stay in their safe little box and don't get out and actually experience the world. Because its to easy to stay in their little corner. Like I said I'm sure thats a bad generalization but thats the general perception I have and I think a lot of others have as well.

CPRISE said "but wouldn't it be heartening to hear from throngs of people who happily lived without cars their whole lives?" To that I say a huge YES! but they aren't totally equipped to help the masses out of the cars. My Ideal time period would be the 1700-1800's western fronter. No cars, no TV, no Hollywood, no internet, no electricity. Where if a man didn't have a huge helping of self reliance, determination, a good horse, a plot of land and a few good neighbors your were..... DEAD.

I continually find myself a simple man trying to make it in an ever increasingly complex world.
April 21, 2008

James said:

 
In 2003 only 4.3% of used tires were converted to asphalt, so that trend is obviously growing quickly. I lived in Phoenix (its awful) and they started using rubberized asphalt a few years ago and its extremely popular. It also reduces friction thereby increasing fuel efficiency.
April 25, 2008

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley
Smiley

busy
 
< Prev   Next >

Should You Get a Carectomy?

Cars are the most inconvenient convenience we have. We're required to have them, but increasingly, we dislike them. At Carectomy, we're trying to figure out how to extract cars from people.

The operation is a little bit painful, but life afterward is much more awesome. If you're interested in carectomies, sign up to our newsletter, or subscribe our RSS feed below.

Weekly Updates

RSS

rss