| Greenhouse Gas Labels for California Cars |
|
|
| Written by Joshua Liberles | |||||
| Saturday, 28 June 2008 | |||||
|
Comments (2)
![]()
Clinch
said:
|
|||||
| Personally, I think the scale should be the other way round (clean being 0 [as in zero-emissions] and the bar representing the amount of pollution) like the EU energy label. Also, does this take in to account the pollution from manufacture (including the mining and refining of raw materials [or not if they're recycled]) and from transportation? Because if not, then choosing a vehicle with a higher score may not actually be better for the environment. |
| One thing I don't like about these arbitrary scales is that they tend to inflate. There is continuous pressure to relax the ratings, so everything moves up. Secondly, the fact that a current car gets 9/10 already suggests that there is nowhere to go and no encouragement to improve the state of the art. Better is to simply measure the true costs and print those. |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Cars are the most inconvenient convenience we have. We're required to have them, but increasingly, we dislike them. At Carectomy, we're trying to figure out how to extract cars from people.
The operation is a little bit painful, but life afterward is much more awesome. If you're interested in carectomies, sign up to our newsletter, or subscribe our RSS feed below.