| Safety in Numbers |
|
|
| Written by Joshua Liberles | |||
| Wednesday, 07 November 2007 | |||
|
Although it may seem that the more riders/walkers buzzing around, the more likely an accident involving an automobile, the converse is true. Freakonomics recently cited a series of studies compiled by Injury Prevention stating that injury rates of cyclists and pedestrians declines with the number of cyclists and walkers. According to Injury Prevention, “an individual’s risk while [cycling] in a community with twice as much [cycling] will reduce to 66%”. In other words, the more people out hoofing and riding, the less likely it is a car will take them out. This pattern is consistent in a variety of time periods, locations, and situations.
From Freakonomics: Discussion: This result is unexpected. Since it is unlikelythat the people walking and bicycling become more cautious iftheir numbers are larger, it indicates that the behavior ofmotorists controls the likelihood of collisions with peoplewalking and bicycling. It appears that motorists adjust theirbehavior in the presence of people walking and bicycling. Thereis an urgent need for further exploration of the human factorscontrolling motorist behavior in the presence of people walking and bicycling. Conclusion: A motorist is less likely to collide with a personwalking and bicycling if more people walk or bicycle. Policiesthat increase the numbers of people walking and bicycling appearto be an effective route to improving the safety of people walkingand bicycling It’s a bit of a catch-22. We need more pedestrians and cyclists to make walking and biking safe. The way some of our nation’s roads are set up, and given the mentality of many motorists, cyclists and pedestrians need to be downright heroic in certain areas to be out there taking back our streets. We can’t rely on these “road warriors” to affect change—we need policy that makes it safer to get out of cars. Once this happens, there will be more walkers and riders, it will get even safer encouraging more participants, and the effect should continue to snowball. Via Freakonomics. Photo via flickr by Grant Neufeld Comments (1)
Treadly and Me
said:
|
|||
 |
Yeah, it's an interesting paradox, isn't it? I've rambled on about this previously. But how to break that vicious circle (people won't ride because they feel it's unsafe, and while people don't ride it is less safe)? |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|
Cars are the most inconvenient convenience we have. We're required to have them, but increasingly, we dislike them. At Carectomy, we're trying to figure out how to extract cars from people.
The operation is a little bit painful, but life afterward is much more awesome. If you're interested in carectomies, sign up to our newsletter, or subscribe our RSS feed below.
Subscribe to this comment's feed
