Avanafil for Sale To Conquer ED

Erectile issue impacts men of all races, and there is with more energetic men starting now having ED. Aging is no longer directly associated with the onset of erectile dysfunction as believed by many. The sexual disorder is in actuality giving a huge impact in a man’s life, and being able to lose manhood untimely is amazingly troublesome and debilitating. To overcome ED problems and help men find their solution to improving their manhood, scientists have developed drugs that will make the lives of ED patients more manageable.

Read more…

Generic Levitra Vardenafil Side Effects

Vardenafil HCl is basically the generic version of the brand Levitra, thus it is sometimes called generic Levitra.  Vardenafil HCl is a drug whose mode of action is to allow men with sexual impotence to get a momentary erection so they will be able to have successful sex with their partners.  Medical professional consider vardenafil HCl to be safer than the popular ED drug Viagra because you will less likely encounter any visual changes while one vardenafil HCl.  In fact, vardenafil is very safe that it can even be used by people with conditions or diseases like diabetes, prostate cancer, hypertension, liver and kidney diseases, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease.  Despite this, it cannot be said that vardenafil HCl is not without any side effects. Read more…

Hydrogen Powered Train for Ontario

by Joshua Liberles on October 3, 2007

hydrogrentrainca Hydrogen Powered Train for OntarioPremier Dalton McGuinty of Ontario, Canada, has been in discussion with local train manufacturer, Bombadier, about installing a hydrogen-powered train in the province. The first line would run along the much-traveled Toronto to Montreal corridor.

The concept of a hydrogen-powered train has also been pursued in Denmark, where a train is slated for launch in 2010, as well as in Japan, where the goal is to have a hydrogen commuter train within the next 20 years. There has been enough global interest in hydrogen-powered railways that Spain is set to host the 4th annual International Hydrail Conference in 2008.

There are two primary reasons why hydrogen power has been viewed by skepticism. A significant amount of energy is required to break water down into hydrogen and oxygen. Currently, that energy is supplied by traditional, dirty technology (think: coal or petroleum). That’s part of the reason Bush has been so quick to back it. The other shortcoming is the huge infrastructure that would need to be installed to allow hydrogen automobiles to conveniently refuel throughout the country.

A train, traveling a set route along a fixed track takes care of problem #2. Additional infrastructure would be similar to any refueling system. And as for problem #1, there are other proposed, greener solutions for generating the power.

The obvious question becomes: is there any reason to use clean energy to make hydrogen, or would it be more efficient to directly power the train with this energy? Although it’s always great to hear of plans for new, greener mass-transport, as Clean Break is quick to point out, McGuinty’s announcement came in the midst of an election campaign. Perhaps talk of hydrogen-power and the much-ballyhooed “water emissions” is just to give McGuinty the green guise he seeks.

Courtesy of our friends at EcoGeek

Related posts:

  1. Three Grand Junction Residents Go Car-Free
  2. NYC’s “Street of the Future”
  3. NYC’s Ninth Avenue Video Update
  4. The Two Mile Challenge
  5. NYCs Ninth Avenue Video Update
  6. Recent Posts

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 saxsux January 19, 2008 at 9:54 am

Just because there’s a correlation, it doesn’t necessarily mean there’s a fact; I could draw a graph of pirates against global temperatures, and use it to “prove” that a decline in the pirate population is the cause of global warming.
Having said that though, I agree with what you’ve said. Keep up the good work! :)


2 Stephen January 19, 2008 at 4:58 pm

The relationship is linear, you’re just looking at the data wrong. Look at it as % walk, cycle, public transport vs. %obesity:
and you can linearly graph the data with a R-squared value of 77%, which is really good for real world data.


3 njh May 17, 2008 at 5:15 pm

You could equally conclude that obesity causes people to not walk as far (which certainly seems more plausible :) . But I agree with the conclusion (obviously for other reasons), that the most effective diet plan is to sell your car.

The way to test causation is to introduce ‘interventions’, whereby you change the believed cause and see whether it has an effect. So, for example, if you can find a city where people have switched from cars to PT/bikes in a short period of time and show that health has improved, you could make a stronger claim, or alternatively, a plce where health went down the tubes as a result of a large mode-shift away from PT. I do not know of any strong examples of the former, but perhaps shanghai is a good example of the latter?

Even better if you have a comparable experiment in the opposite direction: a place where obesity increased for other reasons, and a mode shift occurred. Perhaps Samoans, whose weight is a sign of social standing (sitting?) have changed their mode in the last 100 years, but not had a change in average BMI.


Leave a Comment

Previous post: Staples Goes Bike Friendly

Next post: Who Pays for Paradise Paved