Erectile issue impacts men of all races, and there is with more energetic men starting now having ED. Aging is no longer directly associated with the onset of erectile dysfunction as believed by many. The sexual disorder is in actuality giving a huge impact in a man’s life, and being able to lose manhood untimely is amazingly troublesome and debilitating. To overcome ED problems and help men find their solution to improving their manhood, scientists have developed drugs that will make the lives of ED patients more manageable.
Vardenafil HCl is basically the generic version of the brand Levitra, thus it is sometimes called generic Levitra. Vardenafil HCl is a drug whose mode of action is to allow men with sexual impotence to get a momentary erection so they will be able to have successful sex with their partners. Medical professional consider vardenafil HCl to be safer than the popular ED drug Viagra because you will less likely encounter any visual changes while one vardenafil HCl. In fact, vardenafil is very safe that it can even be used by people with conditions or diseases like diabetes, prostate cancer, hypertension, liver and kidney diseases, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson’s disease. Despite this, it cannot be said that vardenafil HCl is not without any side effects. Read more…
Completing the Circle: Gas at the Pump, War in Iraq, and Global Warming
The war in Iraq, originally known as O.I.L. (Operation Iraqi Liberation, that is) recently passed its fifth anniversary. Oil Change International recently published a study that quantifies the greenhouse gas emissions from the Iraq War as well as some of the environmental opportunity costs.
The study found that the war has generated at least 141 million metric tons of greenhouse gases to date – equal to the damage from adding 25 million more cars to US roads.
What if the resources that had gone into fighting in Iraq, in part to secure more oil, had instead gone towards building renewable energy sources?
From Oil Change International:
Projected total US spending on the Iraq war could cover all of the global investments in renewable power generation that are needed between now and 2030 in order to halt current warming trends.
Just the $600 billion that Congress has allocated for military operations in Iraq to date could have built over 9000 wind farms (at 50 MW capacity each), with the overall capacity to meet a quarter of the country’s current electricity demand. If 25% of our power came from wind, rather than coal, it would reduce US GHG emissions by over 1 billion metric tons of CO2 per year – equivalent to approximately 1/6 of the country’s total CO2 emissions in 2006.
In 2006, the US spent more on the war in Iraq than the whole world spent on investment in renewable energy.
In a power- wealth- and energy-hungry war campaign such as this, the true losses can’t be expressed in terms of missed opportunities to decrease pollution. Thousands of lives have been sacrificed in Iraq to date. But the point that Oil Change’s study drives home is the circular nature of the relationship between demand for oil, global warming, and business as usual. We spend and pollute excessively to bring in more oil, so that we can drive our cars, enrich mega-corporations
, and pollute some more.
- Global Warming – Like, For Real
- What Would Jesus Do About Global Warming?
- Quit Sprawling = Less Driving + Less Warming
- Chrysler and Florida Lottery have Stupid Ideas for Cash-Strapped Drivers
- Record-Breaking Ridership on Amtrak’s Downeaster