adobe illustrator download freeadobe acrobat apple downloadadobe download free premiereadobe premiere tryout 6 download cheap oem software download adobe flash player free adobe acrobat flash downloadadobe 6 download free premier adobe free download kaufen Buy cheap software download adobe acrobat 8 fulldownload adobe photoshop brushesdownload adobe after effects 7 order Download OEM Software
Anti-Carbon, Anti-Corporate Nader Won’t Take “No” For an Answer — Carectomy - Removing Cars from People

Anti-Carbon, Anti-Corporate Nader Won’t Take “No” For an Answer

by Joshua Liberles on February 25, 2008

Nader Anti-Carbon, Anti-Corporate Nader Won’t Take “No” For an Answer
Ralph Nader is back for round three. Yesterday, the controversial candidate announced his run for President on MSNBC’s Meet the Press.

Whatever your feelings about Nader, he didn’t run on the Green Party ticket for nuthin’. This time, Nader is fighting for—and against—green. He’s wearing his hiking boots, and is ready to kick some corporate ass. Per usual, Nader is eager to throw down against corporate giants and carbon emissions.

Unlike any other presidential candidate, Nader favors a carbon tax, similar to the one proposed in the United Kingdom and insists on using solar as a source of alternative energy before exploring nuclear (or, as some would say, “nuke-u-lar”) power. A tax on carbon emissions would drastically reduce greenhouse gases and, no doubt, would put a cap on our current over-use of cars. The U.S. produces nearly 6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide every year—more than any other nation, and more than Russia, India, and Japan, combined.

Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd was the only other candidate to support a carbon tax, though he canned his campaign after poor results in the Iowa caucuses. It’s unsurprising that a carbon tax isn’t a popular favorite among voters—especially if it meant they’d have to walk or bike to the polls. (Sadly, it seems that voting is already too difficult for many Americans who opt not to cast their ballot. Just over 60 percent of Americans showed up to vote in 2004—the highest voter turnout since 1968.)

Apart from carbon emissions, Nader is back in the saddle, battling what he calls “corporate personhood.” Will he go after auto giants, like Ford and Chrysler, or will he just throw a wrench in the Democratic race?

You can find out more about Nader’s policies on his web site.

Photo via flickr by St_Stev.
Nader’s photo courtesy of votenader.org

Related posts:

  1. Anti-Carbon, Anti-Corporate Nader Won’t Take “No” For an Answer
  2. B.C. To Impose Carbon Tax
  3. Expedia Offers Carbon Offsets to Travelers
  4. Carbon Credits Clean Conscience
  5. CDC Considers Anti-Car Campaign

Leave a Comment

Anti-Carbon, Anti-Corporate Nader Won’t Take “No” For an Answer

by Kate Trainor on February 25, 2008

Nader Anti-Carbon, Anti-Corporate Nader Won’t Take “No” For an Answer
Ralph Nader is back for round three. Yesterday, the controversial candidate announced his run for President on MSNBC’s Meet the Press.

Whatever your feelings about Nader, he didn’t run on the Green Party ticket for nuthin’. This time, Nader is fighting for—and against—green. He’s wearing his hiking boots, and is ready to kick some corporate ass. Per usual, Nader is eager to throw down against corporate giants and carbon emissions.

Unlike any other presidential candidate, Nader favors a carbon tax, similar to the one proposed in the United Kingdom and insists on using solar as a source of alternative energy before exploring nuclear (or, as some would say, “nuke-u-lar”) power. A tax on carbon emissions would drastically reduce greenhouse gases and, no doubt, would put a cap on our current over-use of cars. The U.S. produces nearly 6 million metric tons of carbon dioxide every year—more than any other nation, and more than Russia, India, and Japan, combined.

Democratic Sen. Chris Dodd was the only other candidate to support a carbon tax, though he canned his campaign after poor results in the Iowa caucuses. It’s unsurprising that a carbon tax isn’t a popular favorite among voters—especially if it meant they’d have to walk or bike to the polls. (Sadly, it seems that voting is already too difficult for many Americans who opt not to cast their ballot. Just over 60 percent of Americans showed up to vote in 2004—the highest voter turnout since 1968.)

Apart from carbon emissions, Nader is back in the saddle, battling what he calls “corporate personhood.” Will he go after auto giants, like Ford and Chrysler, or will he just throw a wrench in the Democratic race?

You can find out more about Nader’s policies on his web site.

Photo via flickr by St_Stev.
Nader’s photo courtesy of votenader.org

Related posts:

  1. Anti-Carbon, Anti-Corporate Nader Won’t Take “No” For an Answer
  2. Expedia Offers Carbon Offsets to Travelers
  3. CDC Considers Anti-Car Campaign
  4. “Clean Energy” Causing Mass Deforesting, Carbon Emissions
  5. B.C. To Impose Carbon Tax

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

1 MarkR May 7, 2008 at 11:00 pm

In Austin about 10yrs ago there was a bad problem of non handicapped people parking in handicap reserved spaces. There weren’t enough police to battle the problem. So guess what they did? They deputized citizens that passed a background test, trained them and allowed them to give out tickets for violations of ADA parking laws. That is all they were allowed to do. So you never knew if Joe Blow shopper was going to write you a ticket for illegally parking in a ADA parking space.

Cities should do this for cyclists. Deputize them for Cycling related parking violations. But then again I guess they would deputize drivers to give cyclist tickets for running stop signs like some frequently do. but I guess that would be all that bad either.

Reply

2 Katherine May 7, 2008 at 11:38 pm

My husband and I were cycling around Manhattan this weekend. The highlight was the Five Boros ride (42 miles closed to traffic) but we were up and down some busy streets and didn’t feel at all threatened by the drivers. The Parkway was better, though, and this was a weekend day with plenty of light and dry roads. I wouldn’t want to ride without a bike lane at night or in the rain, for sure.

Reply

3 Nick May 8, 2008 at 5:13 pm

When they said they were solving it with spray paint, I thought they meant tagging the vehicles parked in the bike lanes. That would surely get attention!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post: Zipcar Changes Focus in So Cal

Next post: Anti-Carbon, Anti-Corporate Nader Won’t Take “No” For an Answer

Fleet Sales